Update: Apple told The Verge on Nov. 9, five days after this post was widely cited in news reports, that it would issue a software update to prevent Face ID’s disabling after screen replacements.
Apple has been chipping away at iPhone repair work outside their control for years now. With new changes to the iPhone 13, they may be aiming to shatter the market completely.
The new iPhone 13 completely disables its flagship Face ID functionality when you replace its screen. We have confirmed this repeatedly in our lab, testing with many different phones on iOS 15 and 15.1, and our results have been replicated by numerous repair professionals.
This is a dark day for fixers, both DIY and professional. One of the most common phone repairs that could once be done with hand tools now requires a microscope. This means you won’t be able to fix your iPhone screen yourself without sacrificing major functionality. It also has huge implications for the professional repair industry, for which Apple is the dominant brand to service. Small shops could be shuttered, forced to choose between spending thousands on new equipment or losing a major source of income.
For shops that want to survive, their only options will be to join Apple’s onerous IRP network—not an option for shops that value their customers’ privacy—or work past the iPhone’s locks with microsoldering tools and training. This unprecedented lockdown is unique to Apple. It’s totally new in the iPhone 13, and hard to understand as a security measure, given that the Face ID illuminator is entirely separate from the screen. It is likely the strongest case yet for right to repair laws. And it’s all because of a chip about the size of a Tic-Tac, tucked into the bottom of a screen.

The iPhone 13 is paired to its screen using this small microcontroller, in a condition repair techs often call “serialization.” Apple has not provided a way for owners or independent shops to pair a new screen. Authorized technicians with access to proprietary software, Apple Services Toolkit 2, can make new screens work by logging the repair to Apple’s cloud servers and syncing the serial numbers of the phone and screen. This gives Apple the ability to approve or deny each individual repair.
The most sophisticated repair shops have found a workaround, but it’s not a quick, clever hack—it’s physically moving a soldered chip from the original screen onto the replacement. We’ll go into more detail on that process below, but it’s important to note how completely unprecedented this is. Screen replacement is incredibly common. Tens of thousands of repair shops around the world support their communities by replacing screens for customers at competitive prices. And Apple is, with one fell swoop, seemingly cutting the industry off at the knees.
Justin Drake Carroll, CEO and founder of Fruit Fixed, a regional repair chain in Virginia, said that screen replacements were about 35 percent of revenue. “At one point it was 60 percent, a few years ago. We worked really hard to push that figure down, so that one revenue stream wasn’t such a huge part of what we do. Obviously, it’s still an incredibly important part of our business model.”
“This IC [chip] swap thing, it’s a disaster, and we definitely need to fight it, 100 percent,” said Justin Ashford, a repair shop consultant and popular YouTube repair instructor. “But our industry’s definition of what basic repair is needs to change … this is the new basic. Going forward, the first tool you need is a microscope.”

Let’s dive into the technical details. We’ve tested it on iOS 15.1, the latest official iPhone software release. Replacing an iPhone 13’s screen with the same exact screen from an identical brand new iPhone gives this error: “Unable to activate Face ID on this iPhone.”
Apple hasn’t said anything publicly about this issue. Dusten Mahathy, an experienced repair tech, said that a friend inside Apple’s Independent Repair Program was told by Apple support that the issue would be fixed in an iOS update. The only change we’ve seen is that in 15.0, the Face ID feature silently didn’t work, but in the latest version it displays the explicit error message. We reached out to Apple for comment, but they did not reply.
It’s hard to believe, after years of repair-blocking issues with Touch ID, batteries, and cameras, that Apple’s latest iPhone part lock-out is accidental. As far as our engineers can tell, keeping Face ID working on the iPhone 13 after a screen swap should be easier than ever, since its scanner is wholly separate from the display. Technically, yes: Face ID failure could be a very specific hardware bug for one of the most commonly replaced components, one that somehow made it through testing, didn’t get fixed in a major software update, and just happens to lock out the kind of independent repair from which the company doesn’t profit.
More likely, though, is that this is a strategy, not an oversight. This situation makes AppleCare all but required for newer iPhones, unless you happen to know that your local repair shop is ready for the challenge. Or you simply plan to never drop your phone.
Among repair techs we talked to, and inside private repair discussion groups, there’s a sense of trepidation. Technicians are preparing for three immediate options: buy new equipment and retrain technicians for microsoldering work, join Apple’s “authorized” repair network (either AASP or the Independent Repair Program—both could be charitably described as “incredibly restrictive”), or find a new line of work. There is a fourth option, of course: fight like hell for the right to repair.
“This industry was built on iPhone screens, but it won’t be much longer,” Ashford, the repair instructor, said. “This kind of thing has been creeping up on us for a while. Anyone who takes repair seriously knows what they have to do now.”
One experienced repair shop told me they’ve been swapping screen chips since the iPhone X to avoid touch calibration issues and “genuine” part warnings; they’ve got the process down to about 15 minutes. They’ve been slowly building an inventory of refurbished and third-party replacement screens with their chip slots empty, using CNC machines and screen-holding jigs to carve them out.
Another repair tech told me it could be a 30-minute job for some shops—but right now, not many can do it at all.
Microsoldering is skilled work that requires thousands of dollars of equipment and extensive practice before you are proficient. The technical expertise and time required will challenge many repair shops that were previously working primarily with larger parts, above the logic board level. “Three out of 10 shops solder,” the tech said. “One out of [those] three can do BGA work.”

Even when a shop has the equipment and experience to de-solder a BGA chip and move it to a new screen, they’re competing at a disadvantage with Apple’s repair network and protection plan, AppleCare. An authorized Apple technician can make an iPhone 13 accept a new screen with a few clicks inside their secret software—no heating, desoldering, or resoldering required. Apple’s techs can also keep True Tone working, something that independent repair techs have not yet achieved with third-party programmers on newer iPhone 12 and 13 models.
In other words, for those who can access Apple’s network, replacing a screen on the iPhone 13 is no different than before. For independent shops, everything is different.
“[This] is an intentional move to thwart a customer’s ability to repair,” said Carroll, of the Fruit Fixed chain. “Honestly, if every screen repair involved that much work, I would hang it up and we wouldn’t be able to help the thousands of people we do each month.”
For customers who want to fix their iPhone 13 themselves, the options are grim. You could live without any kind of biometric login, like you might have in 2012. Or you could try to move the chip, after buying yourself a microscope or high-resolution webcam, a hot air rework station, a fine-tip soldering iron, and the necessary BGA stencils, flux, and other supplies. We’ve posted a series of videos explaining how to do precisely that, and we sell most of these items. But even with those tools (and lots of heat-resistant tape), it’s a challenge. It’s easy to damage the fragile OLED screen just beyond the cable the chip sits on. One of our engineers learned this the hard way, killing two screens while attempting to remove the chip for photos and verification.

There is a chance that, as with the iPhone 12 camera, Apple could change the iPhone 13’s Face ID from non-functional to an “Unable to verify” warning with a future software update. Such an iOS update arrived in late January, about three months after the iPhone 12 shipped. If that happens, the company will need to explain whether it was intentionally testing the waters for further serializing parts, or just blithely neglecting the needs of its customers and independent fixers.
Apple’s repair software is exclusive to those techs bound by the company’s tightly controlled repair program. Other companies could follow; Samsung, which is expanding its own repair network, made this screen for Apple. Without fair access to companies’ gatekeeping software, the small businesses may feel forced to get good under a microscope, or give in.
“[Shops] either convert to IRP as an independent or via a franchise, level up and be prepared to earn less for more work, or move onto another industry,” said one experienced tech. “Apple is swallowing us up.”
By locking down the most common repair for their devices, Apple has crossed the Rubicon. If we want repair shops to exist in our local communities, we have no choice but to pass right to repair legislation to protect them from this predatory, monopolistic behavior.
20 Comments
Facetime, fingerprint recognition, face ids. All of these are bad security anyway. people can use a picture of you to open your phone or use your fingerprint while you are unconscious. Ease of access equal ease of opening. For anyone.
ffaelan condragh - Reply
Yea I Kinda Agree. I could do without Face ID never saw the security in that and even then it can be finicky sometimes. Touch ID functions for if a phone gets stolen. I still prefer to use my Touch ID though sometimes I have to type in my passcode when my fingers are wet post-shower and the Touch ID sensor doesn’t function well. I had to replace my friend’s iPhone 11’s touch screen and I transferred all the components and was careful and FaceID still didn’t work though I’m not sure why. Oh well. Better to have a nice clean screen than one all cracked up.
Lawrence -
Pretty sure Face ID uses the 3D scanner in the front of the phone so you can’t defeat it with just a picture. And if you need security from someone who has access to you while you’re sleeping, that might be a you problem…
benswinter -
Stop commenting on tech you don’t understand.
Andrew Bevins -
Try doing that on your device… Face ID uses IR sensor to read your skin, not just the physical features.
Wolphin -
Aside of FaceID relevance debate.
If we assume FaceID is a security mechanism, it is normal to enforce it protection by preventing MITM attack between the screen and the rest of the phone.
How do we prevent MITM : authentication and encryption. Yet, you have to authenticate the screen first. How can you trust the screen you bought on internet? How do you proof the ordered screen was not tampered by a side actor?
I dont mind iFixit thinking about repair business, but I regret security concerns were not addressed in this article.
Nothing Nothing - Reply
First things first, the screen is separate from face ID on the 13. But as for the trust thing That comes straight back to right to repair…being able to access software to authorize it/flash it to match your device. In some ways it's not so much that I can replace it myself, but that I can go to any repair shop and have it fixed and not just the ones that pay apple so they can maybe get some of the parts, but only after they already have a customer device. (Look up lewis Rossman…he has some great rants from his shop about apple)
Meanwhile in other industries I can go to the Chevy dealer and ask for just about any part my car could ever need, including security ones, and I can take them home and install them. To me it makes less sense that the average person can rebuild a car from the ground up but can't replace basics on electronics.
Jrdiver -
I'm an lead technologist who has designed several embedded devices, all with industry-leading zero trust authorization. I can authoritatively say that it's totally feasible to both make a device both secure and repair- friendly. Apple chooses not to here.
DePaul Joe -
In paragraph 4 of the article: “It’s totally new in the iPhone 13, and hard to understand as a security measure, given that the Face ID illuminator is entirely separate from the screen.”
There is no MITM attack since the screen is not connected to the Face ID system.
Slugmas -
AUthenticate the screen? easily! give a prompt saying the screen was replaced and when approving the repair to confirm with a pin as a security check before white-listing that device.
Wolphin -
I’m very disappointed with ifixit on the iphone 13. We knew before their teardown that the iphone 13 made virtually every part unswappable thanks to software and yet it still got a respectable score. Common sense would dictate it doesn’t matter how easy it is to get into and swap components in a device if those components will not work properly thanks to software. This phone deserved a zero score.
juliusmalexander - Reply
There’s another conundrum within this story: on one hand we want the most sophisticated phone that our current level of technology is able to deliver, on the other hand we want to be able to have that phone repaired at every streetcorner by anyone who is able to identify the correct end of a screwdriver and has access to Youtube. I’m not sure we can have both, even without discussing the security issue. Yes, there is room to meet in the middle but whose interests are we really protecting here? I would argue that the first item on that list should be the regular customer who needs to use the phone and its security features.
Jelle Hieminga - Reply
Its a different thing what you said and different thing that a company puts deliberately mechanisms in place to stop independent repair. The regular customer (which is not a diplomat in a foreign country to care so much about that level of security) interest is to be able to fix their phones cheaply and easily.
Ilias Kiourktsidis -
Even more so, consumers are choosing to go with unofficial methods for repair because of cost. Businesses like ours providing quality repair on mobile devices are getting eaten alive by these fly by night repair techs who offer onsite screen repair from the trunk of the car. Their secret… cheap parts, reusing adhesives, and no warranty. When these shady businesses start getting bad reviews they close up shop and open under a new name.
PaulIsaacsonSh - Reply
Well, I would never plan to use face recognition, but I don’t agree with Apple’s decision to disable either.
We have Dell wireless keyboards and mice that come as a set paired with one dongle. You lose the dongle and might as well throw the keyboard and mouse away.
Phil - Reply
I am a regular customer, non repairing guy. I’ll be pretty honest here, I’d rather go to Apple anyways. Why? Because I can’t verify these shops are using genuine parts. I don’t want Chinese knock offs. Period. I applaud Apples serialization of parts because I know after repair, I’m still using the $1,200.00 phone I started with. That’s just me. If you can’t afford an extra $179 on top of the $1200 for Apple Care, maybe you should buy something cheap like a Android or something.. it’s like buying a BMW and demanding Toyota repair prices. It’s a flagship, it’s the most advanced Apple produces. I mean really….
Nicholas Cross - Reply
This isn't a fair comparison. You can buy oem or cheap Chinese BMW parts and program them to work with no problem. You have that legal option to devalue your car, but keep everything still running. You do not have that option with Apple yet. You should be able to buy oem apple parts to keep it like the first day you got it, or devalue it.
If it does actually create a security risk, it shouldn't limit the features, it should devalue the phone. Just like how a BMW knows exactly how many oil changes has been done to the car, an iPhone should keep track of what parts have been replaced.
Gio -
Alexander -
Its entirely possible that Apple did this to prevent the theoretical risk of someone transplanting a stolen phone's screen and thus possibly regaining access to its data, as with the touchID cable Error 53 issue.
But this is completely unfair, screens are far too fragile as it is and requiring soldering of a BGA chip to fix is ridiculous.
I actually did discover a fix for touchID on older phones (ie 5c) but unfortunately it got fixed by a later firmware update: if the chip is blank then it simply won't work at all.
Trick here is to find one that hasn't been updated and transfer a blank chip, the phone then picks up and rewrites its SE to accept the blank chip.
On reboot the key then gets copied back on, and all is well.
Andre - Reply
That would be great if it wasn't also an easy idea to put a apple ID password check after a part has been replaced. Creating a secure way to change parts.
Gio -